For buyers searching for Jordan Space Jam shoes, the key choice is between the film-linked look of the Air Jordan 11 Retro and a more wearable low-top version. I rank the 2016 Air Jordan 11 Retro first for its specific 1995-sample details, including the reverse-facing Jumpman and stitched 45. The Air Jordan 11 Retro BG is my pick for the classic patent-leather silhouette, while the men’s Jordan 11 Low is the more casual, lower-cut alternative.
Get beauty and skincare favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
These five listings are not interchangeable: two are low-top models, one is a grade-school-size shoe, and three describe retro pairs tied to the 2016 release or its classic design. I weigh how closely each matches the Space Jam story, what the listed materials and construction can tell a buyer, and how clearly the shoe’s intended wearer is identified. The tradeoffs are practical too: patent leather can crease, the supplied listings give limited fit and cushioning information, and the 2016 models may be harder to source in a desired size.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- The Air Jordan 11 Retro 2016 Release is my first pick for shoppers who want the described 1995-sample details: a reverse-facing Jumpman and stitched 45.
- The Air Jordan 11 Retro BG emphasizes the classic black patent-leather, white, and Concord-purple look, but its listing does not specify a wearer size.
- The men’s Jordan 11 Low favors a lower-cut profile and leather-and-mesh construction, rather than the full-height retro silhouette.
- The Grade School Jordan 11 Low is explicitly listed in size 4Y, so I would choose it for a child or a buyer whose sizing matches that listing.
- The two other 2016 Retro listings describe overlapping design details, but their material descriptions differ; check the individual listing rather than assuming every component is identical.
| Air Jordan 11 Retro ‘Space Jam’ (2016 Release) |  | Best Overall — strongest match for the 1995-sample story | Style code: 378037-003 | Colorway: Black/Concord-White | Release: 2016 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Air Jordan 11 Retro BG “Space Jam” |  | Best Classic Retro Look — patent leather and Concord accents | Style code: 378038 003 | Colorway: Black/Concord-White | Upper material: 100% leather | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Nike Jordan 11 Low “Space Jam” Men’s Shoes, Size 12, Black/Varsity Royal/White (FV5104-004) |  | Best Low-Top for Adults — a lower-cut alternative to the retros | Model: FV5104-004 | Size: 12 | Color: Black/Varsity Royal/White | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Jordan 11 Low Space Jam Grade School Shoes, Size 4Y, Black/Varsity Royal/White (FV5121-004) |  | Best for Grade-School Sizing — size and materials are clearly stated | Style code: FV5121-004 | Size: 4Y | Color: Black/Varsity Royal/White | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Air Jordan 11 Retro “Space Jam” (2016), Style 378037-003 |  | Best for Design-Detail Seekers — 2016 cues with a material-description caveat | Style: 378037-003 | Release: 2016 | Color: Black/Concord-White | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Jordan Space Jam shoe | Inner material | Sole material | Style code | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Jordan 11 Retro ‘Space Jam | Mesh / cotton | — | 378037-003 | China |
| Air Jordan 11 Retro BG "Space | — | Rubber | 378038 003 | Vietnam |
| Nike Jordan 11 Low “Space Jam” | Leather, fabric | Leather | — | — |
| Jordan 11 Low Space Jam Grade | Foam | Rubber | FV5121-004 | — |
| Air Jordan 11 Retro “Space Jam | Textile | Leather | — | China |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Air Jordan 11 Retro ‘Space Jam’ (2016 Release)
This is my lead recommendation because the listing ties the 2016 Air Jordan 11 Retro directly to the sample version Michael Jordan wore in 1995. Its combination of black patent leather, a reverse-facing Jumpman, and the stitched number 45 makes the Space Jam connection more specific than a black-and-purple color scheme alone. For a buyer choosing mainly on the signature design story, those details give this model the clearest reason to sit at the top of the ranking.
Compared with the Air Jordan 11 Retro listed as style 378037-003, this entry describes the same headline elements but specifies a leather upper and mesh/cotton inner material. That is more useful construction information than the other listing’s mixed description of leather, faux leather, and textile. It still does not answer every question: the listing does not state a shoe size, fit guidance, or water protection, and its leather upper calls for care if keeping the finish presentable matters to you.
I would choose this over the Jordan 11 Low models when the full Retro identity matters more than an easier low-top profile. I would not choose it just because its description says the construction is high quality; the supplied details do not establish how it fits or feels on foot. Availability can also be a hurdle, and the product description itself warns that limited availability may lead to high resale prices. Check the offered size and listing specifics before treating this as a straightforward replacement for a newer low-top.
Pros:- Described as modeled after Michael Jordan’s 1995 sample version
- Reverse-facing Jumpman and stitched number 45 provide specific design cues
- Listing identifies a leather upper with mesh and cotton inner materials
- Black/Concord-White colorway suits the classic Space Jam look
Cons:- No size or fit guidance appears in the supplied product details
- Leather upper may need care to maintain its appearance
- The listing notes limited availability and potentially high resale pricing
Best for: Buyers who want a full-height Air Jordan 11 Retro with the listed reverse Jumpman and stitched 45 details.
Not ideal for: Shoppers seeking a clearly specified size, a lower-cut everyday silhouette, or a shoe with stated water resistance.
- Style code:378037-003
- Colorway:Black/Concord-White
- Release:2016
- Upper:100% leather
- Sole:Leather
- Inner material:Mesh / cotton
- Origin:China
- Listing authenticity claim:100% authentic
Our verdict“I rank this first for its clearly described 1995-sample details, provided the available size and listing condition suit you.”
Air Jordan 11 Retro BG “Space Jam”
The Air Jordan 11 Retro BG is my choice for shoppers focused on the classic Space Jam color blocking. Its description calls out shiny black patent leather, white and translucent soles, and purple Concord accents on the sole, tongue, and logo. That gives the design a more detailed visual description than either low-top listing, which names its colorway but provides fewer signature retro cues.
Compared with the 2016 Retro at the top of my list, this BG listing emphasizes the familiar materials and appearance rather than the reverse Jumpman and number 45. That distinction matters: choose the 2016 version if those sample-inspired details are central, and this one if your priority is the patent-leather presentation. The listed rubber sole also differs from the leather sole specified by the two 2016 entries, but the product information does not establish a comfort or durability advantage from that difference.
The main drawback is the finish. Patent leather can crease, and a buyer who wants a pristine-looking pair may need to handle and store it with care. The listing also notes limited size availability, while its BG designation does not come with a size in the supplied specs. I would verify both the exact size and seller’s item details before purchase. It is a compelling retro-style choice, but it is less explicit than the first-ranked 2016 listing about the sample-specific heel and logo details.
Pros:- Shiny black patent leather gives the shoe the described retro appearance
- Concord accents are identified on the sole, tongue, and logo
- Listing specifies a rubber sole
- Black, white, and purple details closely align with the familiar Space Jam palette
Cons:- Patent leather can crease with wear or handling
- The supplied details do not state a size
- Listing notes limited size availability
Best for: Buyers who want the black patent-leather Jordan 11 Retro look with clearly described Concord-purple accents.
Not ideal for: Anyone who needs a specific size confirmed in the listing or prioritizes the 2016 model’s stitched 45 and reverse Jumpman.
- Style code:378038 003
- Colorway:Black/Concord-White
- Upper material:100% leather
- Sole material:Rubber
- Closure:Lace-up
- Origin:Vietnam
- Accents:Purple Concord on sole, tongue, and logo
Our verdict“I recommend this BG Retro for the classic patent-leather look, but not as a substitute for a size-confirmed listing or the 2016 pair’s specific sample details.”
Nike Jordan 11 Low “Space Jam” Men’s Shoes, Size 12, Black/Varsity Royal/White (FV5104-004)
This men’s Jordan 11 Low is the strongest pick for an adult who wants the Space Jam palette in a low-top, rather than the full-height Retro profile. The listing identifies size 12 and a black, Varsity Royal, and white colorway, so it gives a more concrete sizing reference than the two retro entries. Its leather-and-mesh construction also sets it apart from the grade-school low-top, whose description lists mesh outer material and foam inside.
That lower cut is the main reason to choose it, not a claim that it duplicates the 2016 Retro. The description does not mention the Retro’s reverse-facing Jumpman, stitched 45, or patent-leather mudguard details. Compared with the Grade School Jordan 11 Low, this model is explicitly presented as a men’s shoe and has leather and fabric listed for the inner material, but it does not provide a rubber-sole specification. I would not assume details that the listing omits.
The product description says it is not water resistant, so wet-weather use is a poor fit. A leather sole is also specified, but the listing gives no care or traction guidance and does not establish how the shoe performs in daily use. This is the adult low-top option in this group, though its stated size is just one size; buyers outside size 12 should confirm another listing rather than treating this entry as a size range.
Pros:- Men’s low-top profile offers an alternative to the full-height Retro
- Size 12 is stated in the listing
- Leather-and-mesh construction is specified
- Black, Varsity Royal, and white colorway fits the Space Jam theme
Cons:- Product description states that it is not water resistant
- Listing does not describe the 2016 Retro’s reverse Jumpman or stitched 45
- Only size 12 is specified in the supplied product details
Best for: Adult buyers whose size matches 12 and who want a Jordan 11 Low in a Space Jam-inspired colorway.
Not ideal for: Shoppers needing water resistance, a full-height Retro silhouette, or the specific 2016 sample-inspired details.
- Model:FV5104-004
- Size:12
- Color:Black/Varsity Royal/White
- Sole material:Leather
- Outer material:Mesh
- Inner material:Leather, fabric
- Water resistance:Not water resistant
- Style:Jordan 11 Low
Our verdict“I would choose this low-top over the retros when the lower cut and listed size 12 matter more than the signature 2016 details.”
Jordan 11 Low Space Jam Grade School Shoes, Size 4Y, Black/Varsity Royal/White (FV5121-004)
This grade-school Jordan 11 Low has a clear role in the lineup: it is the only listing that names a grade-school size, 4Y. For a child or another wearer whose sizing matches, that explicit size makes it easier to assess than the BG Retro listing, which does not state a size in the supplied details. The low-top shape also makes it a different choice from the full-height Air Jordan 11 Retro models.
Its listed materials are mesh outer material, foam inner material, and a rubber sole, with a lace-up closure. Compared with the men’s Jordan 11 Low, this version gives a more specific rubber-sole detail and a smaller, clearly stated size, while the men’s option names leather and mesh construction. Neither low-top listing includes the signature 2016 Retro cues, so I would choose between them by wearer and listed construction rather than assuming one recreates the Retro more faithfully.
The key limit is just as specific as the key advantage: the listing identifies size 4Y, not a broad size range. Buyers should confirm the size and fit for the intended wearer, since no fit guidance is supplied. The description also does not say that the shoe is water resistant or explain how the materials handle wet conditions. It is a sensible match for the right size and low-top preference, but not the choice for an adult seeking the full patent-leather Retro or the stitched number 45.
Pros:- Grade-school sizing is identified as 4Y
- Rubber sole is specified
- Mesh outer material and foam inner material are listed
- Lace-up closure allows a conventional tied fit
Cons:- Only size 4Y is specified in this listing
- Does not list the Retro’s patent-leather mudguard or stitched 45
- Water resistance and fit guidance are not stated
Best for: A grade-school buyer who needs the listed 4Y size and prefers a low-top with mesh, foam, and a rubber sole.
Not ideal for: Adults outside the listed size, buyers seeking the 2016 Retro details, or anyone needing stated water protection.
- Style code:FV5121-004
- Size:4Y
- Color:Black/Varsity Royal/White
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Mesh
- Inner material:Foam
- Closure:Lace-up
- Style:Jordan 11 Low, grade school
Our verdict“I recommend this as the most clearly size-targeted option for a 4Y wearer, not as an adult-size or full Retro replacement.”
Air Jordan 11 Retro “Space Jam” (2016), Style 378037-003
This listing gives buyers another route to the 2016 Air Jordan 11 Retro, describing the patent-leather mudguard, reverse-facing Jumpman, and stitched number 45. Those are the same headline sample-inspired details that make the first-ranked Retro compelling. I place this version fifth not because the stated design is less relevant, but because its material description raises more questions than the competing 2016 listing.
Compared with the first-ranked Retro, this entry calls the fabric 100% leather but identifies the outer material as faux leather and the inner material as textile. Those categories may describe different components, but the listing does not explain how they map to the shoe. A buyer should read the current seller information carefully rather than assume the construction matches the other 2016 description, which specifies a leather upper and mesh/cotton inner material. The two listings share a style code and several design cues, yet the component details are not identical as presented.
This still makes sense for someone drawn to the reverse Jumpman and stitched 45 who can verify the exact item and material breakdown before ordering. Its black and Concord-white colorway is on-theme, and the listing states that the design is modeled after the 1995 sample version. However, it does not give a size, fit guidance, or an explanation for the mixed leather and faux-leather wording. I would favor the other 2016 Retro listing when its construction details are clearer for the specific item being sold.
Pros:- Listing names the reverse-facing Jumpman and stitched number 45
- Described as modeled after Michael Jordan’s 1995 sample version
- Black/Concord-White colorway reflects the classic Space Jam look
- Style code links it to the 2016 Retro design
Cons:- Material details include both 100% leather and faux leather wording
- No size or fit guidance is given in the supplied specs
- Sole is listed as leather without further care or use guidance
Best for: Collectors or design-focused buyers who want the described 2016 details and are willing to verify the precise materials and listing.
Not ideal for: Shoppers who want an unambiguous material breakdown, a stated size, or a lower-cut shoe.
- Style:378037-003
- Release:2016
- Color:Black/Concord-White
- Fabric:100% leather
- Outer material:Faux leather
- Sole material:Leather
- Inner material:Textile
- Origin:China
- Listing authenticity claim:100% authentic
Our verdict“I would shortlist this Retro for its signature 2016 details, but I rank it below the other 2016 entry until the material description is verified.”
How We Picked
I ranked these shoes by how well each listing answers the question behind best Jordan Space Jam shoes: which option gives a buyer the right mix of Space Jam identity, silhouette, and usable product detail? The 2016 Retro pairs lead because their descriptions name specific design cues tied to Michael Jordan’s 1995 sample version, rather than relying only on the familiar color scheme. The BG Retro follows as a strong classic-style choice with a clear patent-leather and Concord description.
I also separated the two low-tops from the retros rather than treating a lower cut as a lesser version of the same shoe. The men’s listing provides leather-and-mesh construction and a size 12, while the grade-school listing gives a size 4Y and a rubber sole. Those specifics make them easier to place for particular buyers, even though neither listing describes the full-height retro details. I do not infer performance, comfort, exact fit, or authenticity beyond the supplied product information. Where details conflict or are missing, I treat that as a reason for shoppers to verify the listing, not as a feature to assume.
My order reflects Space Jam design relevance, stated materials and construction, and how clearly a model suits a particular buyer. The rankings are not based on price, popularity, or claims about wear testing. Every option has a drawback: sizing is narrow or unspecified, water protection is limited or unlisted, and the retro descriptions leave questions about care and fit. That makes the best choice the one whose listed version, size, and silhouette actually match your needs.
| Jordan Space Jam shoe | Inner material | Origin | Sole material | Color |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Jordan 11 Retro ‘Space Jam | Mesh / cotton | China | — | — |
| Air Jordan 11 Retro BG "Space | — | Vietnam | Rubber | — |
| Nike Jordan 11 Low “Space Jam” | Leather, fabric | — | Leather | Black/Varsity Royal/White |
| Jordan 11 Low Space Jam Grade | Foam | — | Rubber | Black/Varsity Royal/White |
| Air Jordan 11 Retro “Space Jam | Textile | China | Leather | Black/Concord-White |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Jordan Space Jam Shoes
I would narrow this lineup by deciding whether you want a full-height Retro or a low-top, then checking size and material details. Space Jam branding alone does not make the five listings equivalent: the Retro entries describe the 1995-sample design cues, while the two Low models focus on a different cut and specific sizes.
Choose the silhouette before the colorway
The three Retro listings are the closest match if your priority is the classic Air Jordan 11 shape and the described black patent-leather look. The two low-tops are better starting points if you specifically want a lower-cut shoe. I would not treat a Low as a direct substitute for the 2016 Retro: the supplied low-top descriptions do not mention the reversed Jumpman, stitched 45, or patent-leather mudguard. Decide which outline you want before weighing smaller material differences.
Check the size listed for the exact shoe
Only two products here name a size: the men’s Jordan 11 Low is listed in size 12, and the Grade School Jordan 11 Low is listed in 4Y. Those statements do not establish a complete size range or fit across other sizes. The Retro BG and both 2016 Retro listings provide no size in the supplied details. I would confirm the selected size, return terms, and exact item information in the live listing rather than assume availability from the product title.
Read material descriptions as component-level details
The material information differs across the group. One 2016 Retro lists a leather upper and mesh/cotton inner material; the other combines 100% leather wording with faux leather outer material and textile inside. The BG Retro describes a 100% leather upper, while the low-tops list mesh, foam, leather, or fabric in different places. These descriptions are not enough to establish identical construction or care needs. If material is a deciding factor, compare the details for the exact listing and ask the seller to clarify unclear wording.
Match the pick to how you plan to wear it
The men’s Low listing explicitly says it is not water resistant, and the other products do not provide a water-resistance claim in the supplied details. I would not select any of these on the assumption that it will handle wet conditions. Patent leather can crease, according to the BG listing, and leather uppers may need care to maintain their appearance. For a shoe chosen mainly for its collectible or visual appeal, consider whether you are comfortable with that upkeep; for regular use, prioritize the silhouette and size you can verify.
Separate shared design cues from listing certainty
The two 2016 Retro listings share the style code 378037-003 and describe the reverse Jumpman and number 45, but their material details are not presented the same way. That makes the first 2016 entry my clearer overall recommendation, while the second remains worth comparing if its exact item can be confirmed. I would judge the listing in front of me, including its size, condition, materials, and seller information, rather than assuming two listings with the same design description are identical in every component.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Jordan Space Jam shoe is the best overall in this comparison?
I rank the Air Jordan 11 Retro ‘Space Jam’ 2016 Release first because its listing connects the shoe to Michael Jordan’s 1995 sample version and names the reverse-facing Jumpman and stitched 45. It also gives a clearer material breakdown than the other 2016 Retro listing. I would still verify the offered size, since none is stated in the supplied product details.
What is the difference between the Retro and Low options here?
The Retro listings describe a full-height Air Jordan 11, with the 2016 entries naming sample-inspired details such as the reverse Jumpman and heel 45. The Low listings offer a lower-cut profile and identify sizes 12 and 4Y respectively. Their supplied descriptions do not include those signature 2016 Retro details, so I would choose by silhouette first rather than treating the Low models as identical versions of the Retro.
Which option is listed for grade-school sizing?
The Jordan 11 Low Space Jam Grade School Shoes listing specifies size 4Y. It also identifies mesh outer material, foam inner material, a rubber sole, and lace-up closure. I would check the intended wearer’s size against the exact listing because the supplied product information does not provide fit guidance or other available sizes.
Do the product descriptions confirm that these shoes are water resistant?
No. The men’s Jordan 11 Low listing explicitly says it is not water resistant, while the supplied descriptions for the other four shoes do not state a water-resistance rating. I would not assume any of them are suitable for wet conditions based on the materials or colorway alone. Check the exact listing if water protection is a requirement.
Why are there two separate 2016 Air Jordan 11 Retro listings?
Both listings use style code 378037-003 and describe design details modeled after the 1995 sample, including a reverse-facing Jumpman and stitched number 45. Their material descriptions differ: one lists a leather upper with mesh/cotton inside, while the other includes 100% leather wording alongside faux leather outer material and textile inside. I would compare the exact item information and ask for clarification if the component materials matter to you.
Conclusion
My recommendations depend on what you want from a Jordan Space Jam shoe. Choose the Air Jordan 11 Retro 2016 Release if the reverse Jumpman, stitched 45, and sample-inspired design are your main reasons for buying. Pick the Air Jordan 11 Retro BG for its described patent-leather look and Concord accents, while checking size availability and accepting that patent leather can crease.
For a lower-cut adult option, the men’s Jordan 11 Low is the clearest match if size 12 suits you and you do not need water resistance. For a 4Y wearer, the Grade School Jordan 11 Low is the specifically sized choice. I would consider the second 2016 Retro listing only after checking its mixed material description against the exact item being sold. Across all five, verify size and listing details before choosing: the best match is the one whose silhouette, materials, and stated size align with your buyer.
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
