The best ASICS GTX sneakers depend on where you run and how much support you want: my best overall pick is the ASICS Women’s GT-2000 15 GTX, a balanced road-running choice, while the Gel-Trabuco 13 GTX suits trail-focused runners and the GT-1000 15 GTX offers a more straightforward stability option. The lineup also includes the cushioned NOVABLAST 6 GTX and the trail-oriented Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX, so waterproofing is only part of the decision. A GTX membrane can help keep rain and puddle splash out, but it can also retain heat and will not stop water entering over the collar. The right pick comes down to road versus trail, preferred cushioning, fit, and support needs. Read on for the full breakdown of all 11 options and how they differ.
Get beauty and skincare favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- GT-2000 15 GTX is the most balanced road pick: it sits between the more support-led GT-1000 15 GTX and the more cushioning-focused NOVABLAST 6 GTX.
- Trail models serve different terrain needs: Gel-Trabuco 13 GTX is the trail-running choice, while Gel-Trabuco MT GTX is the men’s option for buyers seeking a mid-cut design.
- Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX spans running and everyday use: the lineup includes running-shoe and trainer versions, so buyers should match the specific model to their intended activity.
- Men’s and women’s versions widen the fit and selection choices: GT-2000 15 GTX, GT-1000 15 GTX, Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX, and NOVABLAST 6 GTX appear in both men’s and women’s versions.
- Waterproofing does not make every shoe interchangeable: GTX is shared across the roundup, but road cushioning, stability, trail traction, and shoe height still determine which option fits a buyer’s routes.
| ASICS Women’s GT-2000 15 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Cushioned Stability | Upper: Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX | Midsole: FF BLAST MAX cushioning | Support: 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s GT-1000 15 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Versatile Everyday Runs | Upper: Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX technology | Midsole: FF BLAST cushioning | Support: 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Wet Trails | Upper: Engineered mesh | Outer material: Synthetic fiber | Waterproof lining: GORE-TEX | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s GT-2000 15 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Long-Distance Wet-Weather Support | Upper: Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX Invisible Fit | Midsole: FF BLAST MAX foam with 2 mm extra | Support: 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Trainers |  | Best for Casual Outdoor Use | Outer material: Synthetic | Inner material: Gore-Tex | Membrane: Gore-Tex | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Responsive Road Runs | Upper: Synthetic fiber | Lining: Polyester | Waterproofing: GORE-TEX Invisible Fit | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s GT-1000 15 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Supportive Everyday Wear | Upper: Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX waterproof construction | Midsole: FF BLAST cushioning | Stability technology: 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Trabuco MT GTX Trail Running Shoes |  | Best for Rugged, Wet Trails | Upper material: Synthetic fiber | Waterproofing: GORE-TEX Invisible Fit | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best Value-Oriented Trail Pick | Upper: Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX | Waterproofing: GORE-TEX | Midsole: AMPLIFOAM+ | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Trabuco 13 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Eco-Minded Trail Runners | Upper: Breathable mesh | Upper material: Synthetic fiber | Waterproofing: GORE-TEX Invisible Fit | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX Running Shoes |  | Best for Responsive Road Runs | Upper material: Repeat russel mesh | Waterproof technology: GORE-TEX Invisible Fit | Midsole: FF BLAST MAX foam with FF TURBO SQUARED trampoline pod | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS GTX sneaker | Outsole | Upper | Midsole | Closure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Women’s GT-2000 15 GTX R | ASICSGRIP rubber in forefoot; AHAR LO rubber in heel | Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX | FF BLAST MAX cushioning | Lace-up |
| ASICS Women’s GT-1000 15 GTX R | Rubber with lugged design | Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX technology | FF BLAST cushioning | — |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX | Rubber | Engineered mesh | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s GT-2000 15 GTX Run | ASICSGRIP with AHAR LO rubber | Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX Invisible Fit | FF BLAST MAX foam with 2 mm extra | Lace-up |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX | — | — | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX Ru | Rubber with ASICSGRIP | Synthetic fiber | — | Lace-up |
| ASICS Men’s GT-1000 15 GTX Run | Rubber with lugged design | Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX waterproof construction | FF BLAST cushioning | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Trabuco MT GTX | — | — | — | Lace-up |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX R | Rubber | Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX | AMPLIFOAM+ | Lace-up |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Trabuco 13 G | Rubber with ASICSGRIP | Breathable mesh | — | — |
| ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX | ASICSGRIP rubber with AHAR LO rubber | — | FF BLAST MAX foam with FF TURBO SQUARED trampoline pod | Lace-up |
More Details on Our Top Picks
ASICS Women’s GT-2000 15 GTX Running Shoes
The GT-2000 15 GTX is my pick for runners who want rain protection without giving up a supportive, cushioned ride. Its GORE-TEX Invisible Fit upper pairs with FF BLAST MAX foam and a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, making it better suited to steady road miles than the more trail-focused Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX. ASICSGRIP in the forefoot and AHAR LO rubber in the heel add traction where the shoe meets the ground, which is useful when wet pavement makes ordinary road shoes feel less dependable.
The tradeoff is a more substantial feel than a non-GTX trainer, and this feature-rich stability package may be more shoe than neutral runners need. Its lace-up closure also calls for a secure fit before setting out. Choose it over the GT-1000 15 GTX if plushness is the priority; choose the GT-1000 if you prefer a simpler, less premium cushioning setup.
Pros:- GORE-TEX Invisible Fit upper provides waterproof protection in a breathable mesh construction.
- FF BLAST MAX cushioning is designed for a soft, responsive feel over steady runs.
- 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM adds adaptive support for runners who want more stability.
- ASICSGRIP forefoot and AHAR LO heel rubber provide purpose-specific traction and wear resistance.
Cons:- GORE-TEX construction can make it heavier than a comparable non-waterproof road shoe.
- The stability and cushioning package may feel excessive to neutral runners who prefer a simpler ride.
- Lace-up closure may need adjustment to maintain a secure fit.
Best for: Women running regular road miles in wet weather who want soft cushioning and guided support.
Not ideal for: Neutral runners seeking a light, minimal shoe, or trail runners who need a more trail-oriented outsole.
- Upper:Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX
- Midsole:FF BLAST MAX cushioning
- Support:3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM
- Heel technology:Rearfoot PureGEL
- Outsole:ASICSGRIP rubber in forefoot; AHAR LO rubber in heel
- Sockliner:EVA
- Closure:Lace-up
- Waterproof technology:GORE-TEX INVISIBLE FIT
Our verdict“Choose the Women’s GT-2000 15 GTX for wet-weather road training when cushioned stability matters more than a lightweight feel.”
ASICS Women’s GT-1000 15 GTX Running Shoes
The GT-1000 15 GTX suits runners who want one waterproof shoe for regular runs and mixed-terrain outings, without making plush cushioning the main attraction. Its FF BLAST midsole, Rearfoot PureGEL, and 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM provide a responsive, supported platform, while the lugged rubber outsole offers more grip than a road-focused setup. That makes it a useful middle ground between the trail-biased Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX and the more cushioned GT-2000 15 GTX.
Its versatility has limits: the product details do not specify the GT-2000’s FF BLAST MAX foam or its named ASICSGRIP and AHAR LO outsole compounds. Runners who want a softer, more premium-feeling road ride may prefer the GT-2000; those who spend most of their time on rugged trails should look to the Gel-Sonoma. The waterproof upper also adds weight compared with non-GTX alternatives.
Pros:- GORE-TEX upper helps keep feet dry in rain and snow.
- FF BLAST cushioning offers a responsive ride for everyday running.
- 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and Rearfoot PureGEL provide support and heel cushioning.
- Lugged rubber outsole is suited to mixed surfaces.
Cons:- Waterproof construction may feel heavier than a non-GTX running shoe.
- Its FF BLAST midsole is a less plush proposition than the GT-2000 15 GTX’s FF BLAST MAX.
- Lugged outsole and mixed-terrain design are less specialized than a dedicated trail shoe on rugged routes.
Best for: Women who alternate between road runs and maintained paths and want waterproof protection with guided support.
Not ideal for: Runners prioritizing the plushest cushioning, or trail runners who regularly tackle rugged, technical routes.
- Upper:Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX technology
- Midsole:FF BLAST cushioning
- Support:3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM
- Heel technology:Rearfoot PureGEL
- Outsole:Rubber with lugged design
- Lining:Mesh
- Sockliner:OrthoLite
- Waterproof technology:GORE-TEX
Our verdict“Pick the Women’s GT-1000 15 GTX if you want a supported waterproof shoe for everyday runs that may leave the pavement.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Running Shoes
For off-road routes, the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX makes a clearer case than the road-oriented GT-2000 15 GTX: it combines a waterproof GORE-TEX build with a durable rubber outsole and traction intended for challenging terrain. AMPLIFOAM PLUS and GEL cushioning help soften the impact of uneven paths, while the engineered-mesh upper keeps the shoe grounded in running use rather than positioning it as an all-purpose waterproof sneaker.
That focus is also its main limitation. Compared with the GT-1000 15 GTX, the Gel-Sonoma is the better match for trails, but a less natural choice for someone whose runs are mostly on pavement or whose shoe needs to double as casual footwear. Its waterproof lining can also feel less airy in hot conditions, and the trail-ready construction may weigh more than a regular running shoe. I’d choose it for wet, rugged outings, not for one-shoe road training.
Pros:- GORE-TEX construction provides waterproof protection for wet trail conditions.
- Durable rubber outsole and enhanced traction suit off-road surfaces.
- AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning and GEL technology help soften impact.
- Engineered-mesh upper is specified as breathable as well as waterproof.
Cons:- Trail-focused design is less suited to routine road running and casual wear.
- Waterproof lining may feel less breathable in very warm conditions.
- Trail construction may feel heavier than a regular running shoe.
Best for: Women trail runners who need waterproof coverage and dependable rubber traction for wet, uneven routes.
Not ideal for: Road-first runners or shoppers seeking a breathable warm-weather shoe that also works comfortably for casual wear.
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Outer material:Synthetic fiber
- Waterproof lining:GORE-TEX
- Midsole cushioning:AMPLIFOAM PLUS
- Impact cushioning:GEL technology
- Outsole:Rubber
- Waterproof:Yes
- Breathable:Yes
Our verdict“Choose the Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX for wet trail routes, rather than as a road-first or everyday casual sneaker.”
ASICS Men’s GT-2000 15 GTX Running Shoes
The Men’s GT-2000 15 GTX stands out for long-distance runners who want waterproof coverage and a cushioned, guided ride in the same road shoe. FF BLAST MAX foam with 2 mm extra, Rearfoot PureGEL, and the 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM form a more feature-rich support package than the GT-1000 15 GTX, whose listed midsole is FF BLAST. GORE-TEX Invisible Fit protects against wet conditions, while ASICSGRIP and AHAR LO rubber are assigned to the forefoot and heel for traction and durability.
The added cushioning and waterproof build are not a weight-saving choice: runners who value a minimalist feel may find this shoe substantial. Its 8 mm heel-to-toe drop also makes it a specific fit preference rather than a universal one. Compared with the trail-oriented Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX, this model is the stronger match for supported road miles, not rugged off-road routes.
Pros:- GORE-TEX Invisible Fit upper provides waterproof protection in engineered mesh.
- FF BLAST MAX foam with 2 mm extra is designed for cushioned running.
- 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and PureGEL add support and heel cushioning.
- ASICSGRIP and AHAR LO rubber are specified for the forefoot and heel.
Cons:- Waterproof construction and cushioning may feel heavier than a minimalist running shoe.
- The 8 mm heel-to-toe drop may not suit runners who prefer a lower drop.
- Its road-oriented support design is less suited to rugged trails than the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX.
Best for: Men logging longer road runs in wet weather who want waterproof protection, cushioning, and adaptive stability.
Not ideal for: Minimalist runners, shoppers who prefer a lower-drop shoe, or trail runners needing a more off-road-focused design.
- Upper:Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
- Midsole:FF BLAST MAX foam with 2 mm extra
- Support:3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM
- Heel technology:PureGEL
- Outsole:ASICSGRIP with AHAR LO rubber
- Heel-to-toe drop:8 mm
- Sockliner:EVA
- Closure:Lace-up
Our verdict“Choose the Men’s GT-2000 15 GTX if long road runs in wet conditions call for cushioning and guided support over a lightweight, minimal feel.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Trainers
The Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Trainers are the casual-outdoor pick in this group: their Gore-Tex membrane and ankle-height shaft suit wet-weather walks and outdoor activities, while Gel cushioning adds comfort underfoot. Unlike the running-oriented Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Running Shoes, this product listing gives less detail about its upper and trail traction, so I’d choose the running-shoe version when route grip and trail performance are the main priorities.
The waterproof lining is useful in rain, but it can add weight and may feel less breathable for some wearers. The listed cushioning combines Amplifoam and Gel, though the description does not specify the broader performance details provided for the GT-2000 15 GTX, such as a named support system or outsole compounds. This is a simpler fit for outdoor use than a stability-focused running shoe, but not my first choice for technical trails or hot-weather wear.
Pros:- Gore-Tex membrane provides waterproof coverage for wet-weather outdoor use.
- Gel technology adds cushioning for walking and general activities.
- Ankle-height shaft offers a higher profile than the running-focused options.
- Rubber sole is specified for the outsole.
Cons:- Gore-Tex lining may add weight compared with non-waterproof trainers.
- The design may feel less breathable for some wearers.
- Product details provide less information about trail traction and stability than the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Running Shoes.
Best for: Women seeking a waterproof sneaker for outdoor walks and everyday activities in damp conditions.
Not ideal for: Trail runners who need clearly specified traction and running support, or buyers who prioritize ventilation in warm weather.
- Outer material:Synthetic
- Inner material:Gore-Tex
- Membrane:Gore-Tex
- Sole:Rubber
- Shaft height:Ankle
- Cushioning technology:Amplifoam
- Impact cushioning:Gel
- Intended use:Outdoor activities
Our verdict“Pick these trainers for waterproof outdoor walking and everyday use, but choose the Gel-Sonoma running-shoe version for trail-focused performance.”
ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX Running Shoes
The NOVABLAST 6 GTX is the lively-cushioning pick in this group. Its FF BLAST MAX foam and FF TURBO SQUARED technology are aimed at a springier ride than the more stability-focused GT-1000 15 GTX, making it better suited to runners who want energetic road miles in wet weather. A GORE-TEX Invisible Fit upper adds rain protection without changing the shoe into a dedicated trail model, while ASICSGRIP rubber helps with traction. The tradeoff is that waterproofing can feel warmer in humid conditions and adds weight compared with a non-GTX version. For rocky or uneven routes, I’d choose the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX instead; the NOVABLAST is the more road-oriented option, not the one with a listed rock plate or toe guard.
Pros:- GORE-TEX Invisible Fit construction provides waterproof protection for wet-weather runs.
- FF BLAST MAX and FF TURBO SQUARED technologies target a responsive, energetic ride.
- ASICSGRIP rubber outsole is specified for enhanced traction.
- Lightweight design is suited to performance-oriented running.
Cons:- The waterproof upper may feel less breathable in very humid conditions.
- GORE-TEX adds weight compared with a non-waterproof version.
- The road-focused design is less suited to rugged trails than the Gel-Trabuco models.
Best for: Road runners who want a bouncy, cushioned feel and waterproof protection for rainy training days.
Not ideal for: Runners who train in hot, humid weather or regularly tackle rocky trails; the waterproof upper may feel warm, and this model lacks the listed trail protections of the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX.
- Upper:Synthetic fiber
- Lining:Polyester
- Waterproofing:GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
- Midsole technology:FF BLAST MAX and FF TURBO SQUARED
- Outsole:Rubber with ASICSGRIP
- Closure:Lace-up
- Design:Low-top
Our verdict“Choose the NOVABLAST 6 GTX for a lively, cushioned road-running feel with waterproof coverage, rather than for technical trail protection.”
ASICS Men’s GT-1000 15 GTX Running Shoes
The GT-1000 15 GTX suits buyers who put stable guidance ahead of a particularly bouncy ride. Its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM is designed to support a steadier stride, while FF BLAST cushioning and rearfoot PureGEL add comfort for regular runs and day-to-day use. Compared with the NOVABLAST 6 GTX, this is the more support-minded choice; the NOVABLAST’s listed foam technologies point toward a livelier feel. The GT-1000 also has a lugged rubber outsole for mixed-terrain traction, though the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX is better equipped for rugged trails, with a listed rock protection plate and toe guard. Its GORE-TEX construction protects against rain and snow, but can feel warm in hot weather and weighs more than a non-GTX running shoe.
Pros:- GORE-TEX construction protects against rain and snow.
- 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM provides a stability-focused design.
- FF BLAST cushioning and rearfoot PureGEL are intended to add comfort and responsiveness.
- Lugged rubber outsole supports traction on mixed terrain.
Cons:- Waterproof construction may feel less breathable in hot weather.
- Heavier than a comparable non-GORE-TEX running shoe.
- Less suited to rugged trails than the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX, which includes a rock protection plate and toe guard.
Best for: Runners and walkers seeking waterproof everyday footwear with structured guidance for routine roads and occasional mixed paths.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking a highly springy road shoe or dedicated protection for technical trails; the NOVABLAST 6 GTX emphasizes energetic cushioning, while the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX lists trail-specific guards.
- Upper:Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX waterproof construction
- Midsole:FF BLAST cushioning
- Stability technology:3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM
- Impact technology:Rearfoot PureGEL
- Sockliner:OrthoLite
- Outsole:Rubber with lugged design
Our verdict“Pick the GT-1000 15 GTX if stable, waterproof everyday support matters more to you than the NOVABLAST’s livelier ride or the Gel-Trabuco’s trail protection.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Trabuco MT GTX Trail Running Shoes
For rough routes in wet conditions, the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX has the clearest trail-specific case in this batch. Its rock protection plate and durable toe guard add barriers against trail impacts that aren’t listed for the road-oriented NOVABLAST 6 GTX. GORE-TEX Invisible Fit handles water protection, while FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and rearfoot GEL are intended to soften landings on demanding terrain. That specialization brings a tradeoff: the waterproof build may limit airflow, and its trail-focused protection is more than a road runner needs. Compared with the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX, this model explicitly lists a rock plate and toe guard, making it the stronger match for rugged surfaces; the Sonoma is another trail option but does not list those features in its supplied details.
Pros:- GORE-TEX Invisible Fit provides waterproof protection for wet trails.
- Rock protection plate helps shield the foot from trail impacts.
- Durable toe guard adds protection on rugged routes.
- FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and rearfoot GEL are designed for impact absorption.
Cons:- Waterproofing may reduce breathability compared with non-GTX trail shoes.
- Specialized trail protection is unnecessary for mostly road-based running.
- The supplied product details do not specify outsole grip technology.
Best for: Trail runners who encounter wet, rocky routes and want waterproofing plus listed underfoot and toe protection.
Not ideal for: Road-focused runners or buyers who prioritize airflow in warm weather; the protective trail design and waterproofing are less suited to those needs.
- Upper material:Synthetic fiber
- Waterproofing:GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
- Sole material:Rubber
- Cushioning:FF BLAST PLUS
- Impact technology:Rearfoot GEL
- Trail protection:Toe guard and rock protection plate
- Closure:Lace-up
Our verdict“Choose the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX for wet, rugged trails where its listed rock plate and toe guard matter more than road versatility.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Running Shoes
The Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX is the straightforward choice for buyers who want a waterproof trail shoe with cushioning and traction, without the specifically listed rock plate and toe guard of the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX. Its GORE-TEX engineered-mesh upper is paired with AMPLIFOAM+ and rearfoot GEL, a combination aimed at cushioning impact on climbs and descents. That makes it more trail-oriented than the road-running NOVABLAST 6 GTX, while offering a simpler feature set than the Trabuco MT. The tradeoffs follow its outdoor focus: it may feel heavier than a standard running shoe and is less suitable for regular road use. The description also cites breathability, but a waterproof membrane can still feel warm in hotter conditions.
Pros:- GORE-TEX construction helps keep feet dry on wet trails.
- AMPLIFOAM+ midsole and rearfoot GEL provide cushioning and impact absorption.
- Rubber outsole is designed for off-road traction.
- Engineered-mesh upper is described as breathable.
Cons:- May be heavier than standard running shoes.
- Trail-oriented design is less suitable for regular road running.
- Does not list the rock protection plate or toe guard specified for the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX.
Best for: Trail runners who want waterproof construction, cushioning, and off-road traction for regular outdoor routes.
Not ideal for: Runners who mostly use pavement or need explicit rock-plate and toe-guard protection; the NOVABLAST is more road-focused, while the Gel-Trabuco MT GTX lists those trail guards.
- Upper:Engineered mesh with GORE-TEX
- Waterproofing:GORE-TEX
- Midsole:AMPLIFOAM+
- Impact technology:Rearfoot GEL
- Outsole:Rubber
- Closure:Lace-up
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX for cushioned, waterproof trail running if you don’t need the Gel-Trabuco MT’s listed protective hardware.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Trabuco 13 GTX Running Shoes
The women’s Gel-Trabuco 13 GTX stands out for pairing waterproof trail protection with documented material and dyeing reductions. At least 50% of the main upper material is recycled, and the supplied data reports water and carbon savings from solution dyeing. On the trail, GORE-TEX Invisible Fit helps keep feet dry, while the rock protection plate and ASICSGRIP outsole target rough ground; rearfoot GEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning address impact. Compared with the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX, this model lists more explicit trail-protection and outsole details, making it the more specialized option. That feature set can mean extra weight versus non-GTX shoes, and it is less appealing for mostly paved routes.
Pros:- GORE-TEX Invisible Fit provides waterproof protection for trail conditions.
- Rock protection plate and ASICSGRIP outsole are suited to rugged terrain.
- At least 50% of the main upper material is recycled.
- FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning and rearfoot GEL are designed for impact absorption.
Cons:- May weigh more than a non-GTX trail shoe.
- Trail-focused protection is less useful on mostly paved routes.
- The supplied product details identify limited color options.
Best for: Women trail runners who want waterproof coverage, listed rugged-terrain protection, and recycled upper material.
Not ideal for: Road-first runners or buyers seeking a lighter, more ventilated shoe for warm-weather runs; this waterproof trail model is built around off-road protection.
- Upper:Breathable mesh
- Upper material:Synthetic fiber
- Waterproofing:GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
- Cushioning:FF BLAST PLUS ECO
- Impact technology:Rearfoot GEL
- Outsole:Rubber with ASICSGRIP
- Trail protection:Rock protection plate
- Recycled content:At least 50% of the main upper material
- Solution dyeing reductions:33% water savings and 45% carbon emissions reduction
Our verdict“Pick the Gel-Trabuco 13 GTX if you want a women’s waterproof trail shoe with listed rock protection and recycled upper content.”
ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX Running Shoes
The NOVABLAST 6 GTX is the road-running pick for buyers who want waterproof coverage without giving up a lively, cushioned stride. Its FF BLAST MAX foam and FF TURBO SQUARED trampoline pod are designed to add spring underfoot, while the GORE-TEX Invisible Fit construction helps keep rain out with a less layered-feeling upper. Compared with the GT-2000 15 GTX, this model puts more emphasis on energetic cushioning than on a stability-oriented ride; the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX is the more trail-focused alternative. The tradeoff is that waterproof construction can feel warmer in humid weather, and this GTX version may feel heavier than a non-waterproof running shoe. Its ASICSGRIP and AHAR LO outsole adds wet-surface traction, but it remains best suited to road runs rather than rough trails.
Pros:- GORE-TEX Invisible Fit upper provides waterproof protection in a lightweight-performance design.
- FF BLAST MAX foam and the FF TURBO SQUARED trampoline pod are built for soft landings and a responsive stride.
- ASICSGRIP and AHAR LO rubber support traction and outsole durability.
- Road-running focus offers a livelier alternative to the more stability-oriented GT-2000 15 GTX.
Cons:- The waterproof upper may feel less breathable in very humid conditions.
- GTX construction can add weight compared with non-waterproof running shoes.
- Its road-focused design is less suited to rough trails than the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX.
Best for: Women who run mainly on roads in wet weather and prefer a cushioned, responsive feel over a stability-focused ride.
Not ideal for: Runners in hot, humid conditions or those seeking a dedicated trail shoe; the waterproof upper may feel warm, and this model is less trail-oriented than the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX.
- Upper material:Repeat russel mesh
- Waterproof technology:GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
- Midsole:FF BLAST MAX foam with FF TURBO SQUARED trampoline pod
- Outsole:ASICSGRIP rubber with AHAR LO rubber
- Lining:Polyester
- Closure:Lace-up
- Design:Low-top, round-toe
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the NOVABLAST 6 GTX for wet-weather road running with a springy, cushioned feel, but pick a trail-focused model for rugged routes.”
How We Picked
I organized the 11 shoes by the choices that matter most to wet-weather buyers: intended surface, support style, cushioning character, and how specialized each design is. Road models were judged on their suitability for regular pavement running; trail models were judged on their off-road focus, while the Gel-Sonoma trainer version was treated as an option for buyers seeking a more casual or mixed-use role. I also separated men’s and women’s listings rather than treating them as identical products, since fit and availability can differ.
The ranking favors versatility first: the GT-2000 15 GTX leads as a balanced road-running starting point, with the GT-1000 15 GTX offering a simpler stability alternative and the NOVABLAST 6 GTX serving runners who prioritize a more energetic, cushioned ride. Trail-specific picks follow for buyers whose routes demand them, and the more niche or activity-specific versions rank lower for general use. I weighed each shoe’s intended role against its tradeoffs, including heat retention from waterproof construction, surface limitations, and the risk of choosing support or cushioning that does not match a runner’s needs.
| ASICS GTX sneaker | Midsole | Outsole |
|---|---|---|
| ASICS Women’s GT-2000 15 GTX R | FF BLAST MAX cushioning | ASICSGRIP rubber in forefoot; AHAR LO rubber in heel |
| ASICS Women’s GT-1000 15 GTX R | FF BLAST cushioning | Rubber with lugged design |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX | — | Rubber |
| ASICS Men’s GT-2000 15 GTX Run | FF BLAST MAX foam with 2 mm extra | ASICSGRIP with AHAR LO rubber |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX Ru | — | Rubber with ASICSGRIP |
| ASICS Men’s GT-1000 15 GTX Run | FF BLAST cushioning | Rubber with lugged design |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Trabuco MT GTX | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX R | AMPLIFOAM+ | Rubber |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Trabuco 13 G | — | Rubber with ASICSGRIP |
| ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 6 GTX | FF BLAST MAX foam with FF TURBO SQUARED trampoline pod | ASICSGRIP rubber with AHAR LO rubber |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best ASICS GTX Sneakers
GTX marks a shared waterproofing approach, not a shared ride. I would start with your route and fit needs, then narrow the choices by support and cushioning; buying by membrane alone can leave you with a shoe that feels wrong on the surfaces you run most.
Match the outsole and design to your route
Road shoes and trail shoes solve different problems, even when both have a GTX membrane. Road-focused models generally make more sense for pavement and maintained paths, while trail designs are built around uneven ground and off-road footing. A trail shoe used mostly on sidewalks may feel unnecessarily specialized, and a road shoe may not provide the grip or protection you want on loose terrain. Think about the surface you run most often, not the most adventurous route you might take once in a while. For mixed routes, decide which surface creates the greater risk of slipping or discomfort and prioritize that. The membrane cannot compensate for an outsole that does not suit your terrain.
Choose support for your own gait, not the label
Stability-oriented shoes can suit runners who prefer a more guided feel, but a stability model is not automatically a better choice for every foot. Neutral runners may prefer a less structured ride, while some runners value support most on longer outings when fatigue changes their stride. Do not select a shoe solely because you have been told you overpronate; comfort and how the shoe feels during movement matter too. If possible, compare the GT-1000 and GT-2000 family fit and ride before settling on one. A shoe that feels supportive but restrictive during a short try-on may become distracting over distance. When you are unsure, favor a comfortable fit over assumptions based on a category name.
Balance cushioning against control
More cushioning can soften repeated pavement impact, but a taller or more lively-feeling ride is not automatically more comfortable for every runner. Some buyers prefer a stable, predictable platform; others want a springier sensation for daily runs. Consider your pace and typical distance as well as softness: a shoe intended to feel energetic may not be the right match if you want a grounded, steady ride. Compare cushioning in motion when you can, since a quick hand press tells little about how a shoe behaves under your stride. Avoid choosing solely by the most dramatic-sounding midsole description. Your best match is the one that stays comfortable and controlled across your usual run.
Treat waterproofing as weather protection, not full immersion
A GTX membrane can help block rain and surface water from passing through the upper, making it useful for wet roads, damp paths, and splashing through shallow puddles. It cannot prevent water from entering over the opening if rain is heavy or water rises above the collar. Waterproof construction can also hold more warmth than a highly breathable non-waterproof upper, which may be uncomfortable in mild or hot weather. If your runs are mostly dry, a non-GTX shoe may offer a cooler feel and more flexibility in use. Consider socks and layering as part of the wet-weather setup, but do not expect them to fix a poor shoe fit. Choose GTX for the conditions you encounter often enough to justify its tradeoffs.
Check fit, socks, and shoe height together
Waterproof uppers can feel less forgiving than lightweight mesh, so the fit that works in a dry-weather shoe may not transfer perfectly. Try shoes later in the day or after a run, when feet may be slightly larger, and leave room for natural toe movement. If you plan to wear thicker socks in cold weather, test the shoe with those socks rather than guessing. A snug fit can reduce heel movement, but squeezing the forefoot can become uncomfortable once your feet warm up. The mid-cut Gel-Trabuco MT GTX also covers more of the ankle area than standard-height running shoes, which some buyers may like and others may find restrictive. Compare shoe height and collar comfort alongside length and width.
Pay for the right specialization, not extra features you will not use
A specialized trail build makes more sense when your regular routes include rough or slippery terrain; it may be unnecessary for a buyer who runs only on pavement. Likewise, a stability-focused model is useful only if its guided feel suits your stride, while a cushioned neutral shoe may better match a runner who values a softer, more responsive ride. Before paying more for a more specific design, ask what problem it solves on your usual routes. The lineup includes road, trail, running, and trainer options, so activity labels are a useful first filter. Do not assume a model with more apparent protection will be the most comfortable daily shoe. Match the shoe’s purpose to your routine and let fit decide between close alternatives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use an ASICS GTX running shoe as an everyday walking shoe?
Yes, a running model can work for walking if its fit and ride feel comfortable at a slower pace. A road-focused option is usually a more natural choice for paved daily use than a trail shoe with a more specialized outsole. The Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Trainers are also listed in this roundup for buyers considering a more casual or mixed-use option. Keep in mind that waterproof uppers may feel warm during long indoor periods or mild-weather walks. Try the shoe with the socks you plan to wear and check that the toe box stays comfortable after your feet warm up.
Will GTX shoes keep my feet dry if water comes over the top?
No shoe membrane can keep water out if it enters through the collar. GTX can help block water passing through the shoe’s upper, but deep puddles, flooded paths, and heavy rain running down your legs can still soak socks. Shoe height affects how easily splash or runoff reaches the opening, though a higher collar is not a guarantee against water entry. For shallow puddles and rainy pavement, the membrane can still be useful. If your route includes water above the collar, choose a different route or use footwear designed for that exposure.
Should I choose the GT-1000 15 GTX or GT-2000 15 GTX?
Both are road-running options with a stability-oriented role, so the choice should come down to how much guidance and cushioning you prefer rather than the model names alone. The GT-1000 15 GTX is the more straightforward stability pick in this roundup, while the GT-2000 15 GTX is positioned as the more balanced all-around recommendation. Try both if you are between sizes or sensitive to midfoot structure, since small fit differences can matter over longer runs. Do not assume that more support will automatically feel better. Pick the one that feels comfortable and controlled at your normal pace.
Are the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Running Shoes and Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX Trainers the same kind of shoe?
They share the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX name, but this roundup lists running-shoe versions as well as a trainer version, so buyers should not assume the intended use is identical. The running listings are the clearer match for people shopping specifically for wet-weather runs. The trainer listing may suit buyers looking at casual wear or mixed everyday use, depending on its fit and construction. Check the exact product listing and intended activity before ordering. If your priority is regular trail running, compare the Sonoma against the more explicitly trail-focused Gel-Trabuco options.
Is a GTX shoe a good choice for warm or dry weather?
It can still be worn, but the waterproof upper may feel warmer and less airy than a non-GTX alternative. If most of your runs happen in warm, dry conditions, you may not get enough benefit from the membrane to justify that comfort tradeoff. For frequent rain, cold damp paths, or wet commutes, GTX protection may be more useful. Think about the weather you encounter across most of your running season rather than buying for a rare storm. If you keep one pair for all conditions, prioritize fit and comfort in the temperatures you run in most often.
Conclusion
For most road runners who want one dependable wet-weather option, I would start with the ASICS Women’s GT-2000 15 GTX as the best overall pick; the men’s GT-2000 15 GTX is the corresponding choice in this lineup. The GT-1000 15 GTX is my best value-style recommendation for buyers who want a simpler stability-focused option, while the NOVABLAST 6 GTX is the premium-leaning choice for runners who favor a more cushioned, energetic road ride. Beginners should start by comparing the GT-2000 and GT-1000, then choose the one that feels comfortable and appropriately supportive rather than buying by reputation. For trail-specific needs, I would look first at the Gel-Trabuco 13 GTX; buyers drawn to a mid-cut design can compare it with the men’s Gel-Trabuco MT GTX. Choose the Gel-Sonoma 8 GTX if its running or trainer version better matches your route and everyday use, and skip trail-focused designs if pavement is your only surface.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
