The best running shorts balance a comfortable fit, useful storage, and freedom of movement without adding bulk. My best overall pick is the Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-Inch Running Shorts for runners who want a straightforward, versatile unlined design; the CRZ YOGA 2-in-1 Double-Layer Running Shorts stand out for a shorter lined option, while the NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts with Zipper Pockets suit runners who prioritize secure storage. The main choice is whether you prefer a built-in liner or separate layers, plus how much coverage and pocket space you need. Read on for the full breakdown of all 15 options and help matching a pair to your running habits.
Get beauty and skincare favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- The Under Armour Launch 5-Inch is the roundup’s most versatile starting point: its unlined cut avoids the extra layer that defines many other picks.
- Lined and 2-in-1 designs dominate this selection, offering built-in support but adding fabric that some runners may find warm or restrictive.
- Inseam length changes the feel as much as the liner. The 3-inch CRZ YOGA option favors a shorter cut, while the 7-inch Under Armour Launch Run offers more coverage.
- Pocket design separates practical running picks from simpler training shorts. NORTHYARD and the 3-inch zip-pocket option emphasize secure storage, while pocket placement still needs to suit your stride and phone.
- Multipacks and multiple inseam choices serve different needs. The men’s 5-inch 2-pack favors rotation and everyday use; Maamgic’s 5-inch/7-inch choice makes fit preference the bigger decision.
| THE GYM PEOPLE Women’s High-Waisted Quick-Dry Running Shorts |  | Best for Coverage with Freedom of Movement | Body fabric: 80% polyamide, 20% spandex | Insert fabric: 90% polyester, 10% spandex | Design: Double-layered with built-in liner and side slits | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Men’s 2-in-1 Quick-Dry Athletic Shorts |  | Best for Everyday Training | Fabric: Listed as 100% polyester; description also mentions a polyester-spandex blend | Design: Two layers with inner lining | Pockets: Inner and outer pockets | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Men’s 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts, 2-Pack |  | Best Value Multipack | Material: 92% polyester, 8% spandex | Inseam: 5 inches | Pack quantity: 2 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| maamgic Men’s 5-Inch 2-in-1 Quick-Dry Gym and Running Shorts |  | Best for Liner Support and Storage | Outer fabric: 90% polyester, 10% spandex | Liner fabric: 86% polyester, 14% spandex | Inseam: 5 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| CRZ YOGA 2-in-1 Double-Layer Running Shorts, 3-Inch Inseam |  | Best for Short-Inseam Running | Body fabric: 86% polyester, 14% elastane | Accessories fabric: 88% polyester, 12% elastane | Inseam: 3 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Pudolla Men’s 2-in-1 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts |  | Best for Secure Carrying | Shell fabric: 90% nylon, 10% elastane | Liner fabric: 87% polyester, 13% elastane | Inseam: 5 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts with Zipper Pockets |  | Best for Pocket Security and Weather Flexibility | Fabric: 90% polyester, 10% elastane | Inseam options: 5, 7, or 9 inches | Lining: Unlined | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Women’s 2-in-1 High-Waisted Running Shorts with Liner Pocket |  | Best Women’s 2-in-1 Pick | Fabric: 95% polyester, 5% elastane | Rise: Mid rise | Design: Double-layered with side-slit outer layer | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-Inch Running Shorts |  | Best for a Close, Lightweight Fit | Fabric: 100% polyester | Fit: Fitted | Inseam: 5 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Men’s 2-in-1 Lined Running Shorts |  | Best for Multi-Sport Pocket Capacity | Fabric: 85% polyester, 15% spandex | Design: 2-in-1 shorts with built-in compression liner | Pockets: Liner phone pocket, two side pockets, and one back zippered pocket | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Under Armour Men’s Launch Run 7-Inch Unlined Shorts |  | Best for Unlined 7-Inch Coverage | Material: 100% polyester | Recycled content: Main body contains at least 90% recycled polyester, excluding trims and embellishments | Inseam: 7 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| JWJ Men’s 2-in-1 Workout Running Shorts with Compression Liner |  | Best for Secure Storage | Outer fabric: 80% polyester, 20% spandex | Liner fabric: 80% polyester, 20% spandex | Inseam: 7 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| adidas Men’s adi365 Essentials Running Shorts |  | Best for Simple Lined Runs | Fabric: 100% polyester | Liner: Built-in mesh brief | Closure: Drawstring | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Men’s 3-Inch Running Shorts with Zipper Pockets |  | Best for Short-Striding Freedom | Shell: 92% polyester, 8% spandex | Liner: 90% polyester, 10% spandex | Inseam: 3 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Maamgic Men’s 2-in-1 Athletic Running Shorts with Liner, 5″/7″ |  | Best for Pocket-Rich 2-in-1 Storage | Fabric: 90% polyester, 10% spandex | Design: 2-in-1 shorts with mesh compression liner | Inseam options: 5 inches or 7 inches | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| running short | Care | Pockets | Closure | Design |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE GYM PEOPLE Women’s High-Wa | Hand wash only | Hidden waistband pocket and back waistband zipper pocket | Pull-on | Double-layered with built-in liner and side slits |
| Men’s 2-in-1 Quick-Dry Athleti | Machine wash | Inner and outer pockets | Drawstring | Two layers with inner lining |
| Men’s 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running | Hand wash only | Two concealed zippered pockets | — | — |
| maamgic Men’s 5-Inch 2-in-1 Qu | Machine wash cold; tumble dry low | Two side pockets and one zippered back pocket | Drawstring | Quick-drying outer layer with compression liner |
| CRZ YOGA 2-in-1 Double-Layer R | Machine wash | Deep side zipper pockets | Pull-on | Double layer with built-in spandex shorts |
| Pudolla Men’s 2-in-1 5-Inch Qu | Hand wash only | Phone pocket and rear zip pocket | — | 2-in-1 with breathable liner |
| NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Runni | Machine wash | Three zippered pockets: two side pockets and one back pocket | — | — |
| Women’s 2-in-1 High-Waisted Ru | Hand wash only | — | — | Double-layered with side-slit outer layer |
| Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-In | Machine wash | — | Pull-on | — |
| Men’s 2-in-1 Lined Running Sho | Machine wash | Liner phone pocket, two side pockets, and one back zippered pocket | Drawstring | 2-in-1 shorts with built-in compression liner |
| Under Armour Men’s Launch Run | — | Open hand pockets and right-side internal phone pocket | Pull-on with internal drawcord | — |
| JWJ Men’s 2-in-1 Workout Runni | — | — | Elastic waistband with drawstring | — |
| adidas Men’s adi365 Essentials | Machine wash | — | Drawstring | — |
| Men’s 3-Inch Running Shorts wi | Hand wash only | Two front zippered pockets | Drawstring | Split-leg running shorts with compression lining |
| Maamgic Men’s 2-in-1 Athletic | Machine wash | Three concealed zippered pockets and one liner phone pocket | — | 2-in-1 shorts with mesh compression liner |
More Details on Our Top Picks
THE GYM PEOPLE Women’s High-Waisted Quick-Dry Running Shorts
The built-in liner and high waistband make these a strong choice for runners who want extra coverage without adding a separate layer. Side slits give the outer shorts room to move during strides, while the four-way-stretch, moisture-wicking fabric is suited to active workouts. Compared with the CRZ YOGA 2-in-1 Double-Layer Running Shorts, this pair has a higher-rise waistband and a less abbreviated listed inseam, though the CRZ option specifies a 3-inch cut and anti-slip dots on its liner. Hidden waistband storage and a rear zip pocket help keep small items close, but the supplied details do not establish that either pocket fits a phone. The main tradeoff is care: hand washing only is less convenient than machine-washable options.
Pros:- Built-in liner adds coverage without requiring separate shorts.
- Side slits allow more freedom of movement.
- High, wide waistband offers a secure-feeling fit.
- Hidden waistband and rear zip pockets store small essentials.
Cons:- Hand-wash-only care takes more effort than machine-washable alternatives.
- Pocket descriptions do not specify capacity for a phone.
- No inseam measurement is provided to help judge leg coverage.
Best for: Women who want a high-rise fit, a built-in liner, and side slits for unrestricted movement on runs and workouts.
Not ideal for: Runners who want machine-wash convenience or need a clearly specified phone-sized pocket.
- Body fabric:80% polyamide, 20% spandex
- Insert fabric:90% polyester, 10% spandex
- Design:Double-layered with built-in liner and side slits
- Pockets:Hidden waistband pocket and back waistband zipper pocket
- Waistband:Wide elastic, high-waisted
- Fabric features:Four-way stretch, quick-dry, moisture-wicking
- Closure:Pull-on
- Care:Hand wash only
Our verdict“Choose these if you want high-waisted, lined running shorts with side-slit mobility and can accept hand washing.”
Men’s 2-in-1 Quick-Dry Athletic Shorts
Breathable lining, an adjustable drawstring, and inner and outer pockets give these shorts a flexible role across workouts and casual wear. They stand apart from the Men’s 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts, 2-Pack, which specify a 5-inch inseam and concealed zip pockets; this option does not list an inseam or identify zippered storage. That makes its fit and pocket security harder to judge for dedicated running, but the elastic waistband and drawstring offer a useful way to adjust the fit. The outer layer is described as durable and the inner layer as quick-drying, although the fabric information conflicts: the specs list 100% polyester while the description mentions a polyester-spandex blend. I’d favor it for general training rather than buyers who need precise fabric or running-fit details.
Pros:- Quick-drying, breathable inner lining suits workouts.
- Elastic waistband and drawstring allow fit adjustment.
- Inner and outer pockets provide more storage options.
- Lightweight construction is described as having a durable outer layer.
Cons:- Fabric composition is inconsistent between the specs and description.
- No inseam length is supplied for judging running coverage.
- Pocket closure and capacity are not specified.
Best for: Men seeking lightweight, lined shorts for mixed gym sessions and everyday wear, with an adjustable waist and multiple pockets.
Not ideal for: Runners who need a confirmed fabric composition, a specified inseam, or secure zippered pockets for carrying essentials.
- Fabric:Listed as 100% polyester; description also mentions a polyester-spandex blend
- Design:Two layers with inner lining
- Pockets:Inner and outer pockets
- Waistband:Elastic with adjustable drawstring
- Closure:Drawstring
- Care:Machine wash
- Available colors:9
- Available sizes:5
Our verdict“Pick these for adaptable gym-to-everyday wear, but choose a better-documented running short if fit details and pocket security matter.”
Men’s 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts, 2-Pack
Two pairs and a defined 5-inch inseam make this multipack a practical choice for runners who want a familiar, mid-length cut in rotation. Its relaxed fit, stretch fabric, perforated details, and mesh panels favor ventilation and easy movement; compared with the maamgic Men’s 5-Inch 2-in-1 Quick-Dry Gym and Running Shorts, it skips the built-in compression liner but gives buyers two pairs and concealed zippered pockets. That simpler construction may suit runners who prefer an unlined feel, while the maamgic pair is better for those seeking liner support and extra pocket options. The adjustable internal drawcord helps tailor the waist, but a relaxed cut may feel loose to runners who prefer close-fitting shorts. Hand-wash-only care also offsets some of the convenience of buying a two-pack.
Pros:- Two pairs provide a ready rotation for training.
- 5-inch inseam offers a clearly specified mid-length cut.
- Mesh panels and perforated details support ventilation.
- Two concealed zippered pockets help secure small essentials.
Cons:- Hand-wash-only care is less convenient for frequent use.
- Relaxed fit may feel too loose for runners who want a close cut.
- No built-in liner is specified for added support or coverage.
Best for: Men who want two lightweight, relaxed-fit pairs with a 5-inch inseam and zippered storage for regular training.
Not ideal for: Runners who prefer a compression liner, a close-fitting silhouette, or easy machine-wash care.
- Material:92% polyester, 8% spandex
- Inseam:5 inches
- Pack quantity:2
- Fit and ventilation:Relaxed fit with stretch fabric, perforated details, and mesh panels
- Waistband:Elastic with internal drawcord
- Pockets:Two concealed zippered pockets
- Care:Hand wash only
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose this multipack for relaxed 5-inch shorts with zippered pockets, provided you do not need a liner or machine washing.”
maamgic Men’s 5-Inch 2-in-1 Quick-Dry Gym and Running Shorts
A supportive compression liner and three pockets give this 5-inch pair a more feature-rich setup than the unlined Men’s 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts, 2-Pack. The inner layer is designed to help reduce chafing, while the quick-drying, stretchy outer fabric and adjustable drawstring suit running as well as gym sessions. Its two side pockets and zippered back pocket offer more carrying options than the two concealed zip pockets on the multipack, though the supplied details do not specify pocket capacity. The tradeoff is a warmer, more layered feel than a simpler unlined short, which may not appeal to runners who favor minimal fabric. Care calls for machine washing cold and tumble drying low, so it is convenient to clean but needs those settings followed.
Pros:- Compression liner is designed to provide support and help reduce chafing.
- Quick-drying stretch fabric suits running and gym workouts.
- Three pockets include a zippered back pocket for secured storage.
- Drawstring waistband allows fit adjustment.
Cons:- Two layers may feel warmer or bulkier than unlined shorts.
- Care requires cold machine washing and low tumble drying.
- The liner fabric composition differs from the outer fabric and is separately specified.
Best for: Men who want a 5-inch running short with a built-in compression liner, adjustable waist, and several storage pockets.
Not ideal for: Runners who prefer an unlined, minimal feel or want care instructions without specific temperature settings.
- Outer fabric:90% polyester, 10% spandex
- Liner fabric:86% polyester, 14% spandex
- Inseam:5 inches
- Design:Quick-drying outer layer with compression liner
- Pockets:Two side pockets and one zippered back pocket
- Closure:Drawstring
- Care:Machine wash cold; tumble dry low
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick this pair if liner support and multiple pockets matter more to you than the lighter feel of an unlined short.”
CRZ YOGA 2-in-1 Double-Layer Running Shorts, 3-Inch Inseam
The 3-inch inseam and built-in spandex shorts suit runners who want a shorter cut with integrated coverage. Unlike the THE GYM PEOPLE Women’s High-Waisted Quick-Dry Running Shorts, this pair specifies a shorter inseam and adds anti-slip dots to the inner shorts; the tradeoff is less outer-leg coverage. Its high-rise compression waistband has no drawstring, so the pull-on design stays simple but offers less adjustment than shorts with a drawcord. Deep side zipper pockets are described as fitting a phone and small essentials, a useful advantage when carrying more than a key. The lightweight, quick-drying fabric supports active use, and machine-wash care is straightforward. I’d choose it for a secure-feeling short cut, not for runners who want extra length or a waist they can fine-tune.
Pros:- 3-inch inseam provides a short, running-focused cut.
- Built-in spandex shorts add coverage, with anti-slip dots to help hold them in place.
- Deep side zipper pockets are described as fitting a phone and small essentials.
- Lightweight, quick-drying fabric is machine washable.
Cons:- Short inseam may provide too little coverage for some runners.
- No drawstring means the waistband cannot be adjusted independently.
- Compression-style waistband may not suit those who prefer a less fitted waist.
Best for: Women who prefer a short 3-inch running cut, built-in coverage, and deep zipper pockets for a phone and small essentials.
Not ideal for: Runners who want longer leg coverage or need a drawstring to adjust waistband fit.
- Body fabric:86% polyester, 14% elastane
- Accessories fabric:88% polyester, 12% elastane
- Inseam:3 inches
- Design:Double layer with built-in spandex shorts
- Waist:High rise, compression waistband, no drawstring
- Pockets:Deep side zipper pockets
- Closure:Pull-on
- Care:Machine wash
Our verdict“Choose this pair for a short inseam, built-in liner, and phone-friendly zipper pockets if you do not need drawstring adjustment.”
Pudolla Men’s 2-in-1 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts
The Pudolla Men’s 2-in-1 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts suit runners who want built-in support and separate places for essentials without carrying a belt. Their supportive liner helps reduce rubbing, while the phone pocket and rear zip pocket offer more organized storage than the single liner pocket on the Women’s 2-in-1 High-Waisted Running Shorts with Liner Pocket. The 5-inch inseam keeps the outer short relatively brief, and the adjustable drawcord lets runners fine-tune the waist. Compared with the NORTHYARD shorts, Pudolla adds a liner but gives up their three zippered pockets and machine-wash care. The main tradeoff is practical: hand-wash-only care takes more effort, and this men’s design may not suit buyers seeking other fit options.
Pros:- Built-in liner offers support and helps limit chafing.
- Phone pocket and rear zip pocket separate essentials.
- Lightweight shell and liner are designed to breathe.
- Drawcord allows waist adjustment.
Cons:- Hand-wash-only care is less convenient than machine-washable alternatives such as NORTHYARD.
- Men’s design limits fit options for buyers seeking a different cut.
Best for: Men who want a supportive 2-in-1 short with dedicated phone storage and a zippered pocket for keys or cards.
Not ideal for: Runners who machine-wash their workout gear or want a choice of inseam lengths and fit options.
- Shell fabric:90% nylon, 10% elastane
- Liner fabric:87% polyester, 13% elastane
- Inseam:5 inches
- Design:2-in-1 with breathable liner
- Pockets:Phone pocket and rear zip pocket
- Waist closure:Drawstring
- Care:Hand wash only
Our verdict“Choose Pudolla if you want a 5-inch, lined short with dedicated phone and zippered storage and can manage hand washing.”
NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts with Zipper Pockets
The NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts are the unlined pick for runners who value secure storage and a more adaptable outer short over built-in support. Three zippered pockets can help keep small items in place, while UPF 50+ protection and a water-resistant coating add useful coverage for sunny or changeable conditions. Its four-way stretch, side vents, and reflective strips make it more feature-packed for outdoor routes than the fitted, lined Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-Inch Running Shorts. That comparison also clarifies the tradeoff: NORTHYARD leaves support to the wearer, so runners who prefer a liner may favor Under Armour or Pudolla. Choose among 5-, 7-, and 9-inch inseams, but note that the relaxed fit may take careful size selection.
Pros:- Three zippered pockets provide secure storage.
- UPF 50+ protection and water-resistant coating suit outdoor runs.
- Four-way stretch, side vents, and flatlock seams support movement and comfort.
- Available in 5-, 7-, and 9-inch inseams and XS–4XL sizes.
Cons:- Unlined construction does not provide the built-in support found in Pudolla or Under Armour Launch.
- Relaxed athletic fit may require careful size selection.
Best for: Runners who carry a phone, keys, and other small essentials and prefer an unlined short with several inseam choices.
Not ideal for: Runners who want built-in thigh support or a close, fitted cut without having to select a size carefully.
- Fabric:90% polyester, 10% elastane
- Inseam options:5, 7, or 9 inches
- Lining:Unlined
- Pockets:Three zippered pockets: two side pockets and one back pocket
- Sun protection:UPF 50+
- Fit:Relaxed athletic fit
- Sizes:XS–4XL
- Care:Machine wash
Our verdict“Pick NORTHYARD if secure zippered storage and outdoor coverage matter more to you than a built-in liner.”
Women’s 2-in-1 High-Waisted Running Shorts with Liner Pocket
These Women’s 2-in-1 High-Waisted Running Shorts pair a supportive liner with a side-slit outer layer, making them a straightforward choice for runners who want coverage without a restrictive stride. The liner pocket keeps a small essential close, while the drawstring helps adjust the waist. Compared with Pudolla’s men’s 2-in-1 shorts, this design is specified with a mid rise and a pocket in the liner rather than a separate rear zip pocket; it is less suited to carrying several items securely. Side slits give the outer layer room to move, but buyers who want dedicated zippered storage may prefer NORTHYARD’s three-pocket setup. Hand-wash-only care is the clearest compromise, and the listed details do not specify an inseam length.
Pros:- Built-in liner adds support and coverage.
- Side-slit outer layer allows a freer range of movement.
- Lightweight, breathable fabric is moisture-wicking and quick-drying.
- Liner pocket keeps a small essential close.
Cons:- Hand-wash-only care requires more effort than machine-washable options.
- The liner pocket is less suited to securing valuables than NORTHYARD’s zippered pockets.
- No inseam length is specified in the provided product details.
Best for: Women who want a lightweight lined short with a drawstring waist, side slits, and a pocket for one small item.
Not ideal for: Runners who need zippered storage for valuables, machine-wash convenience, or a specified inseam length.
- Fabric:95% polyester, 5% elastane
- Rise:Mid rise
- Design:Double-layered with side-slit outer layer
- Waistband:Elastic with drawstring closure
- Pocket:Elastic pocket on right side of built-in liner
- Fabric features:Moisture-wicking, quick-drying, lightweight, breathable
- Care:Hand wash only
Our verdict“Choose this pair if you want a women’s lined short with a movement-friendly outer layer and only need storage for one small item.”
Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-Inch Running Shorts
The Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-Inch Running Shorts are aimed at runners who prefer a close-fitting short with a built-in liner and uncomplicated construction. Lightweight woven fabric, sweat-wicking performance, and breathable mesh panels focus the design on ventilation and support rather than pocket-heavy utility. Compared with the NORTHYARD shorts, Launch trades three zippered pockets and an adjustable drawstring for a fitted, lined pull-on style. It also offers a more body-hugging feel than Pudolla’s 2-in-1 design, which uses a separate outer layer over its liner. That fit may appeal during runs but feel too close for buyers who like roomier shorts. The pull-on closure has no adjustable fastening described, so waist adjustment is limited by the product details provided.
Pros:- Lightweight woven fabric is designed for running.
- Sweat-wicking material dries quickly.
- Mesh panels support ventilation.
- Internal mesh liner adds coverage and support.
Cons:- Fitted cut may feel too close for runners who prefer relaxed shorts.
- Pull-on closure has no adjustable fastening described.
- Product details do not specify pockets, unlike the storage-focused NORTHYARD shorts.
Best for: Men who prefer a fitted 5-inch running short with an internal mesh liner and ventilation-focused construction.
Not ideal for: Runners who want an adjustable drawstring, multiple secure pockets, or a relaxed fit.
- Fabric:100% polyester
- Fit:Fitted
- Inseam:5 inches
- Liner:Internal mesh
- Closure:Pull-on
- Care:Machine wash
- Construction:Lightweight woven fabric with breathable mesh panels
Our verdict“Choose Launch if you want a close-fitting, lined 5-inch short and do not need the adjustable waist or pocket options found on other picks.”
Men’s 2-in-1 Lined Running Shorts
These Men’s 2-in-1 Lined Running Shorts make the most sense for runners who want compression support and several places to carry gear for a run that may lead into a gym session. The built-in compression liner includes a phone pocket, while two side pockets and a zippered back pocket provide more storage options than the single liner pocket on the Women’s 2-in-1 High-Waisted Running Shorts. Quick-dry, breathable fabric and machine-wash care add day-to-day practicality compared with hand-wash-only Pudolla. The tradeoff is fit: the liner is described as tight, and the product details give no sizing guidance to help buyers judge that feel. Unlike the Under Armour Launch, this design offers a drawstring and several listed pockets, but less clarity on cut and fit.
Pros:- Built-in compression liner provides thigh support.
- Liner phone pocket, two side pockets, and a zippered back pocket offer varied storage.
- Lightweight, breathable fabric is described as quick-drying.
- Machine-wash care is more convenient than Pudolla’s hand-wash-only instructions.
Cons:- Compression liner may feel too tight for runners who prefer less body-hugging support.
- No specific sizing or fit guidance is provided.
- Product details do not specify an inseam length.
Best for: Men who split time between running and gym workouts and want a compression liner with several pockets for essentials.
Not ideal for: Runners sensitive to tight compression or buyers who need clear sizing and fit guidance before choosing shorts.
- Fabric:85% polyester, 15% spandex
- Design:2-in-1 shorts with built-in compression liner
- Pockets:Liner phone pocket, two side pockets, and one back zippered pocket
- Closure:Drawstring
- Care:Machine wash
- Fabric features:Lightweight, breathable, quick-dry
Our verdict“Choose these shorts for multi-sport use if you want compression support and several storage options, but skip them if you need fit guidance or a relaxed liner.”
Under Armour Men’s Launch Run 7-Inch Unlined Shorts
A longer, unlined cut sets these apart from the built-in-support designs in this group. The 7-inch inseam offers more thigh coverage than the Men’s 3-Inch Running Shorts with Zipper Pockets, while the fitted shape and breathable mesh panels keep the lightweight polyester focused on running rather than bulky layering. Sweat-wicking, quick-drying fabric suits warm sessions, and the internal drawcord helps hold the waistband in place. An internal phone pocket adds a dedicated spot for a phone, alongside open hand pockets. The main tradeoff is the lack of a liner: runners who want built-in support should look at the JWJ or adidas options instead. Medium stretch and a fitted cut may also feel restrictive to anyone who prefers a relaxed short.
Pros:- Lightweight polyester wicks sweat and dries quickly.
- Mesh panels add ventilation for warm runs.
- Internal drawcord helps secure the fitted waistband.
- Internal phone pocket supplements the open hand pockets.
Cons:- Unlined construction provides no built-in support.
- Fitted cut and medium stretch may not suit runners who prefer a relaxed fit.
Best for: Runners who prefer a fitted 7-inch short without a liner and want a dedicated internal phone pocket.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want built-in compression or brief support, or who prefer a loose, roomy fit.
- Material:100% polyester
- Recycled content:Main body contains at least 90% recycled polyester, excluding trims and embellishments
- Inseam:7 inches
- Liner:Unlined
- Fit:Fitted
- Closure:Pull-on with internal drawcord
- Pockets:Open hand pockets and right-side internal phone pocket
- Fabric weight:Lightweight
Our verdict“Choose these for lightweight 7-inch coverage and a dedicated phone pocket if you prefer running without a built-in liner.”
JWJ Men’s 2-in-1 Workout Running Shorts with Compression Liner
Multiple storage options give these 7-inch shorts a practical edge over simpler lined choices like the adidas Men’s adi365 Essentials Running Shorts, which specify a single back zippered pocket. JWJ combines a zippered pocket with other pockets, plus a headphone hole and towel loop, making it better suited to runners who carry small essentials or move between workouts. The integrated compression liner adds support beneath a breathable mesh outer layer, while the drawstring waistband helps keep the shorts secure during movement. The extra features bring a tradeoff: this is a more equipment-oriented design than a minimalist running short, and the listed sizing runs small, so buyers may need to size up. The compression liner also makes it a poor match for anyone who dislikes close-fitting support.
Pros:- Compression liner provides close-fitting support.
- Zippered pocket and additional pockets help carry essentials.
- Breathable mesh outer layer is designed for quick drying.
- Drawstring waistband can be adjusted to help prevent slipping.
Cons:- Sizing runs small, which may require choosing a larger size.
- Compression liner may feel too restrictive for runners who prefer an unlined short.
- Headphone hole and towel loop add features that minimalist runners may not need.
Best for: Runners and gym-goers who want a supportive 2-in-1 short with secure storage and workout-friendly extras.
Not ideal for: Buyers who prefer an unlined or minimalist running short, or anyone unwilling to account for the small-running sizing.
- Outer fabric:80% polyester, 20% spandex
- Liner fabric:80% polyester, 20% spandex
- Inseam:7 inches
- Liner:Integrated compression liner
- Closure:Elastic waistband with drawstring
- Features:Headphone hole and towel loop
- Pocket features:Multiple pockets, including a zippered pocket
- Fabric:Breathable mesh outer layer; quick-dry
Our verdict“Pick JWJ if secure storage and a supportive liner matter more to you than a simple, lightweight design.”
adidas Men’s adi365 Essentials Running Shorts
The built-in mesh brief makes these a straightforward choice for runners who want support without a separate compression short. Compared with the JWJ Men’s 2-in-1 Workout Running Shorts, the adidas design is simpler: it specifies a brief liner and one flat zippered back pocket rather than a compression liner and several workout-oriented extras. That pared-back setup may appeal to runners who want less going on around the legs, while the adjustable drawcord helps keep the waistband secure. The pocket is useful for carrying a small essential, but the listing specifies only one back zippered pocket, so storage is limited compared with the JWJ or Maamgic options. The available details also do not specify an inseam, making it harder to choose based on leg coverage.
Pros:- Built-in mesh brief offers breathable support.
- Lightweight polyester is designed for running.
- Adjustable drawcord helps secure the waistband.
- Flat zippered back pocket keeps a small item enclosed.
Cons:- Only one pocket is specified, limiting storage options.
- Inseam length is not provided in the supplied product details.
- Brief liner may not suit runners who prefer an unlined or compression-lined short.
Best for: Runners who want a lightweight short with a breathable built-in brief and a secure pocket for one small item.
Not ideal for: Runners who need multiple pockets, want a specified inseam before buying, or prefer a compression-style liner.
- Fabric:100% polyester
- Liner:Built-in mesh brief
- Closure:Drawstring
- Pocket:Flat zippered back pocket
- Care:Machine wash
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose adidas for a simple lined running short with one secure pocket, not for extensive storage or a specified leg length.”
Men’s 3-Inch Running Shorts with Zipper Pockets
Three-inch inseam and split-leg construction make this the movement-first pick in the group. The shorter cut exposes more of the thigh than the 7-inch Under Armour Men’s Launch Run 7-Inch Unlined Shorts, which can suit runners who want less fabric around the legs. Unlike that unlined model, these include a breathable compression lining, and the two front zippered pockets offer more secure storage than the single-pocket adidas option. The shell’s polyester-spandex blend and internal drawcord add stretch and an adjustable fit. There are clear compromises: the liner may feel too close for runners who dislike compression, and the hand-wash-only care is less convenient than the machine-wash options. The brief cut also offers less coverage than the longer shorts here.
Pros:- Split-leg design allows a wide range of movement.
- Two front zippered pockets secure small items.
- Quick-drying outer layer and breathable lining suit active use.
- Internal drawcord allows waistband adjustment.
Cons:- Three-inch inseam provides less coverage than the 7-inch options.
- Compression lining may feel restrictive to some runners.
- Hand-wash-only care takes more effort than machine-wash shorts.
Best for: Runners who favor a short inseam, unrestricted leg movement, and two zippered pockets.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want more thigh coverage, dislike compression liners, or need machine-wash convenience.
- Shell:92% polyester, 8% spandex
- Liner:90% polyester, 10% spandex
- Inseam:3 inches
- Design:Split-leg running shorts with compression lining
- Pockets:Two front zippered pockets
- Closure:Drawstring
- Care:Hand wash only
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose these for a short, movement-focused cut with secure front pockets if you are comfortable with a compression liner and hand washing.”
Maamgic Men’s 2-in-1 Athletic Running Shorts with Liner, 5″/7″
Four listed storage locations make these the strongest pick here for runners who carry a phone and several small items: there are three concealed zippered pockets plus a phone pocket in the liner. That is more storage detail than the adidas Men’s adi365 Essentials Running Shorts, which specify one back zippered pocket, and a more running-specific setup than the JWJ pair’s headphone hole and towel loop. The 2-in-1 build combines a mesh compression liner with stretch fabric, perforated panels, and side slits to balance support with airflow and movement. Choosing between the 5-inch and 7-inch inseams also gives buyers a useful coverage choice. The main downside is the close-fitting liner, which may not suit everyone; the color-changing logo is an appearance detail whose effect varies with UV exposure.
Pros:- Three concealed zippered pockets plus a liner phone pocket offer extensive storage.
- Available in 5-inch and 7-inch inseam options.
- Stretch fabric and side slits support movement.
- Perforated panels and quick-drying mesh liner promote airflow.
Cons:- Compression liner may feel too snug for runners who prefer unlined shorts.
- The color-changing logo’s appearance depends on UV exposure.
Best for: Runners who want a choice of 5- or 7-inch coverage, a supportive liner, and several places to secure essentials.
Not ideal for: Runners who prefer unlined shorts, dislike compression-style liners, or want a simple design with minimal pockets.
- Fabric:90% polyester, 10% spandex
- Design:2-in-1 shorts with mesh compression liner
- Inseam options:5 inches or 7 inches
- Pockets:Three concealed zippered pockets and one liner phone pocket
- Movement features:Four-way stretch and side slits
- Ventilation:Breathable perforated panels
- Care:Machine wash
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick Maamgic for a supportive 2-in-1 short with substantial storage and a choice of two inseam lengths.”
How We Picked
I compared the 15 options on the details that most affect a run: liner construction, inseam, pocket security, fit flexibility, and likely versatility. I gave weight to whether a design makes a clear case for a particular runner, such as wanting built-in support, a shorter cut, more coverage, or zippered storage. I also considered practical ownership factors, including whether a multipack helps with regular rotation and whether the construction may add warmth or bulk.
The ranking favors shorts with a clear, useful role and fewer compromises for their intended use—not a single style that suits everyone. The Under Armour Launch 5-Inch leads as a simple, adaptable unlined choice; the lined models follow where their extra support or specific cut benefits a narrower preference. Lower placements reflect more specialized designs, overlapping options, or tradeoffs that buyers should weigh against their running habits. Product details provided here do not establish fabric weight, exact pocket capacity, or durability, so I avoid treating those as confirmed advantages.
| running short | Closure | Care |
|---|---|---|
| THE GYM PEOPLE Women’s High-Wa | Pull-on | Hand wash only |
| Men’s 2-in-1 Quick-Dry Athleti | Drawstring | Machine wash |
| Men’s 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running | — | Hand wash only |
| maamgic Men’s 5-Inch 2-in-1 Qu | Drawstring | Machine wash cold; tumble dry low |
| CRZ YOGA 2-in-1 Double-Layer R | Pull-on | Machine wash |
| Pudolla Men’s 2-in-1 5-Inch Qu | — | Hand wash only |
| NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Runni | — | Machine wash |
| Women’s 2-in-1 High-Waisted Ru | — | Hand wash only |
| Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-In | Pull-on | Machine wash |
| Men’s 2-in-1 Lined Running Sho | Drawstring | Machine wash |
| Under Armour Men’s Launch Run | Pull-on with internal drawcord | — |
| JWJ Men’s 2-in-1 Workout Runni | Elastic waistband with drawstring | — |
| adidas Men’s adi365 Essentials | Drawstring | Machine wash |
| Men’s 3-Inch Running Shorts wi | Drawstring | Hand wash only |
| Maamgic Men’s 2-in-1 Athletic | — | Machine wash |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Running Shorts
Shorts that look similar on a product page can feel quite different over a run. I’d choose in this order: decide how you want the liner to work, pick coverage that stays comfortable at your usual pace, then check storage and fit details against what you carry and wear underneath.
Choose a Liner Based on Comfort, Not Just Support
A built-in brief or compression liner can reduce the need for separate underwear and may help limit fabric movement, but it also adds a layer against the skin. That extra layer can feel warm during humid runs or restrictive if the fit is too close. Unlined shorts give you more control over what you wear underneath, though that means choosing a comfortable base layer yourself. A common mistake is assuming every 2-in-1 short feels the same; liner length, snugness, and outer-short movement all affect the experience. If you are between preferences, start with the construction you already tolerate during longer workouts rather than choosing by feature count.
Match Inseam to Your Stride and Coverage Preference
A shorter inseam can allow more leg movement and feel less bulky, while a longer cut provides more coverage and may suit runners who prefer fabric that stays lower on the thigh. Neither length is automatically better for pace or comfort. Consider where the hem lands when you lift your knee, climb, or lengthen your stride, not only how the shorts look while standing. Runners who experience inner-thigh rubbing should pay attention to both inseam and liner coverage, since a short outer layer can still have a longer inner layer. If you are unsure, compare measurements with shorts you already wear successfully rather than relying on a label alone.
Treat Pockets as a Fit and Movement Question
A pocket is useful only if its contents stay manageable while you run. Zippers can help secure keys or a small phone, but a loaded pocket may bounce or pull at the waistband if its position and capacity do not suit the item. Before choosing, make a list of what you actually carry: a key, cards, or a phone require different storage than gels. Check whether a design places storage on the outer short or liner, since access and movement can differ. A common buying mistake is prioritizing the number of pockets over whether your usual items fit securely without shifting.
Check Waistband Fit and Layer Compatibility
The waistband has to stay put without pinching, especially on longer outings when repeated movement can make a small fit issue distracting. Use the brand’s size chart and compare waist measurements rather than assuming your size is consistent across labels. For 2-in-1 shorts, account for the liner’s close fit as well as the outer waistband; sizing up to ease the liner can leave the waist loose. If you plan to wear a running belt, check that the waistband and pocket placement will not compete with it. When a product offers multiple inseams, treat that as a cut choice, not a substitute for checking the size guide.
Pay More for a Real Use-Case Advantage
Extra features matter when they solve a recurring problem: secure storage for essentials, a liner you prefer, or a cut that feels right over many miles. They matter less when they add layers or details you will not use. A multipack can make sense if you already know the fit works and want pairs for regular rotation; it is a riskier first purchase if the liner or waistband is unfamiliar. Beginners may be better served by a simple, versatile pair before buying shorts specialized for a particular inseam or storage setup. Compare construction and fit first, then weigh convenience features against the chance they will go unused.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I choose lined running shorts or an unlined pair?
Choose lined shorts if you like built-in coverage and support without selecting a separate base layer. Pick unlined shorts if you prefer to control your own underlayer or want to avoid extra fabric against your skin. A liner can feel warm or restrictive if its fit does not suit you, so the label alone cannot guarantee comfort. If possible, use your experience with compression garments or built-in briefs as a guide. For this roundup, the Under Armour Launch 5-Inch represents the simpler unlined route, while several 2-in-1 options add a closer-fitting layer.
Are 3-inch, 5-inch, and 7-inch inseams better for different runs?
Inseam length is mainly a matter of coverage, mobility, and personal comfort, rather than a reliable indicator of performance. A shorter cut may feel freer around the legs, while a longer one gives more coverage. The CRZ YOGA 3-inch model and the Under Armour Launch Run 7-inch model illustrate those ends of the range in this lineup. A 5-inch cut can be a middle-ground choice, but how it fits your body matters more than the number alone. Check the hem position and liner length against your movement before deciding.
Are zippered pockets worth choosing for running?
They are useful when you carry small essentials that you want secured, such as a key or card. For a phone, check the pocket’s dimensions and placement; a zipper does not prevent bounce if the phone is too large or the pocket shifts during your stride. Runners who carry little may prefer a lighter, simpler design rather than paying attention to pocket details they will not use. This roundup includes zip-pocket choices from NORTHYARD and a 3-inch men’s option, but buyers should verify storage needs against the exact product details. Try a short run with your usual items before relying on any pocket for longer outings.
Is a multipack a good choice for someone buying their first running shorts?
A multipack can be practical once you know the cut and fit work for you, since it supports regular rotation between runs and washes. For a first pair, it can lock you into a liner, waistband, or inseam preference you have not yet confirmed. The men’s 5-inch quick-dry 2-pack is the lineup’s clear rotation-focused option, but its convenience is most useful when that style already suits you. Start with one pair if you are unsure about built-in liners or sizing. After a few runs, you will have better evidence about whether buying the same design in multiples makes sense.
How should I choose between compression-lined 2-in-1 shorts and a regular brief-lined pair?
A compression liner generally fits closer to the body, while a brief-style liner offers a different, less full-coverage feel. The right choice depends on how much support and fabric contact you prefer, as well as whether the liner stays comfortable through your usual run length. Product names do not always give enough detail to judge liner coverage, so check the listed construction and fit information before ordering. The JWJ model explicitly calls out a compression liner, making that feature central to its appeal. If you dislike snug layers, an unlined short may be a safer choice than either type of built-in liner.
Conclusion
For the broadest range of running needs, I’d start with the Under Armour Men’s Launch 5-Inch as the best overall pick: its unlined design keeps the choice straightforward. For best value and regular rotation, the Men’s 5-Inch Quick-Dry Running Shorts, 2-Pack make the most sense if you already know a 5-inch cut suits you. The best premium choice in this lineup is the adidas Men’s adi365 Essentials Running Shorts for buyers who prefer a dedicated running model, though its listed details do not establish an advantage in storage or liner support over the alternatives. Beginners should favor a simple, familiar fit such as the Under Armour unlined option rather than committing to a close-fitting liner before they know their preference. For specific needs, choose the CRZ YOGA 3-inch for a shorter lined cut, NORTHYARD for zippered storage, or the Under Armour Launch Run 7-inch for more coverage. Match the liner and inseam to your comfort first, then let pockets and pack size break a close decision.
